I was at the library the other
day with a young boy who is staying with us. I haven’t been in the children’s
section for quite a while, so I decided to stick with something safe: Goldilocks
and the 3 Bears. It was billed as a modern retelling, but really there was only
one modification from the classic tale: no gender was assigned to the 3 bears.
We had a large bear, a medium-sized bear, and a small bear.
At a doctor’s office with the
same young boy a few days later, I read another fairly recently issued children’s
book about a young character with a fairly generic plot: child having a bad day; decides to run away;
but then returns after missing sounds and sights of home (as well as meals.) All
the characters in the book were talking animals-although the type of animal was
not clear from the illustrations. As with “the 3 bears”, there were no specific
gender references to either the child character or to the adult figure (note
that the household had only 1 adult figure.) Gender specific pronouns were absent.
Now this is just an anecdotal
finding, but I won’t object so much in the future to Mrs. Curley’s insistence on
saving boxes and boxes of children’s books for our grandchildren and/or other
child visitors to our little homestead.
Up until now (homeschooling and
all), we have been somewhat insulated (by design) from the cultural revolution
against our children. I have read numerous articles and warnings about what is
being taught in public schools; I do worry about nieces and nephews. But truly
we haven’t experienced some of these things firsthand.
So what’s so devastating about
genderless bears? First there are no genderless bears living in the woods! (Farm
kids will know this-but we have less and less of these.) Secondly, the 3 bears
are representative of a family. One book doesn’t make a cultural revolution,
and in the absence of the 2nd book, I would have thought it stupid
but uninteresting. But if this is a trend, it has an agenda to destroy the
family and indoctrinate our children-especially because it isn’t “in your face”,
but subtle as the case builds, book after book.
And, by the way, in both cases,
the young boy doesn’t read yet, so I did insert gender (Papa Bear an Mama Bear)
into both books.
Oremus pro invicem!
3 comments:
We go to used book sales and rescue the old books that have been thrown out for being politically incorrect or not in the "spirit of Vatican II."
good catch. although anyone who didn't know YOU might try to infer you had some agenda by putting a seemingly random Latin phrase at the end of your article.
better to find facts first than to falsely accuse, and worry for no reason. you can call the publisher and ask. they have to approve all titles before pressing them, and should know if it was approved for some reason, or altered in some way before print...
It starts with the misuse of the word gender.
http://aberrosexualism.blogspot.com/2014/03/normal-0-21-false-false-false-en-us-x.html?m=1
Post a Comment